Last time I posted, I led off the entry by alluding to that on which I will now opine.
I'm just going to come right out and say it: people who wear apparel of schools (colleges, mostly) that they do not attend tick me off. The only exceptions are the following.
1. If a parent attended said institution.
2. If a sibling attended or attends said institution.
3 (and even this is a bit of a stretch). If a significant other attends or attended said institution.
4. If you are an ardent fan of one or more of said institution's sports teams. And in that case, the garment must specify the sport.
If you don't qualify any of the above conditions, please don't wear other colleges' garments.
I'll start in high school. As many of you know, I went to a boarding school of whose aura and tradition I am fiercely proud--Westminster School in Simsbury, CT. There was a girl who transferred to Westminster from a decidedly inferior institution, Taft School (I am only half serious about this; we are rivals). She was a nice girl, but it always peeved me to see her wearing Taft clothing around campus. It just didn't seem right. Likewise, there was a girl who aimed to transfer from Westminster to another decidedly inferior institution, Hotchkiss (again, I say this tongue-in-cheek; Hotchkiss grads are people too, I guess). Well before she was even accepted to Hotchkiss, she began sporting the garb around campus. The sight of this really infuriated me. Just a slap in the face. Call me a homer, but I think that just ain't right, dear readers.
Another thing that peeved me a bit was people wearing college apparel before even receiving a letter of acceptance. Talk about putting the UHAUL before the family car, not to mention the arrogant temptation of karma. For this reason, I never wore the apparel of a college to which I had merely applied. I signified my intention to come here to Washington & Lee by donning the hat in the kitchen one late-April morning before school. I had never graced my head with it before then.
We progress to college. I don't claim to know the background on many people well enough to know if they fall into categories 1-4 above stipulated. All I can say is that I've seen sweatshirts (I will never seriously call them "hoodies") shouting "Harvard!" "Vanderbilt!," and goodness knows what else. I'd like to think that these people fall into categories 1-3, but I'm not sure. If not, then fie on them, I say!
Bottom line: apparel of college you don't attend, BAD! Pride in your alma mater, GOOD!
Happy dressing.
(NOTE: If you do this, I don't hate you; I'm not that intolerant. It just seems silly is all.)
No lyrical selection this evening.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
4 comments:
"It had never graced my head with it before then." I think I detect a typo here. You need to proofread your blog posts work carefully before putting them up. Don't you mean "I had never graced my head with it before then?" Despicable...a dirty stain on the pristine "Tim's Varied Musings."
Completely agree, except with exception #3. That, in my opinion, is no excuse. Call it if you will being college whipped.
franke,
Typo eliminated. Biatch.
Normally I would agree with you even though I was sporting my top choice's sweatshirt long before april. But If you do have SOME sort of attachment or affiliation with a school (Perhaps one that you just haven't thought of yet. Eg: I own a ton of Yale sweats just cuz I live near there and buy alot of other things in the Co-op) you are justified to wear its clothing. As for signifiant others- buying your own shirt is a little lame, but stealing your spouses the next morning is totally legit.
As for Taft girl- dude, if you already own a comfy shirt it's a waste not to wear it.
Post a Comment